Educational

Memecoins went from a crypto inside joke to a multi‑billion‑dollar casino almost overnight, and regulators are clearly done pretending it is just harmless fun.&nbsp;The new technical proposal regarding crypto regulation submitted to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lays out a blueprint for separating “legal” memecoins from a long list of tokens that would be labeled “non‑compliant” and effectively pushed out of regulated markets.&nbsp;This seems to be a stress test for how far a rules‑based framework can go in trying to tame something as chaotic and hype‑driven as memes on-chain.In this post, we’ll walk you through what we know so far about the memecoin regulation proposal.<h2 id="what-was-the-old-rule-for-memecoin-regulation">What was the Old Rule for Memecoin Regulation?</h2>Until early 2025, the working assumption was that most crypto assets risked being treated as securities under the Howey test, depending on how they were issued and marketed.​<ul><li>Existing law application: Regulators tried to fit meme coins into existing financial laws developed for traditional assets like stocks and bonds.</li><li>The Howey test: The key legal standard applied was the Howey Test, used to determine if an asset is an “investment contract” (a security).</li><li>Legal grey area: Most meme coins existed in a legal grey area because they often failed the Howey test’s criteria for a security.</li><li>Focus on fraud laws: Without clear securities classification, enforcement actions often fell under general anti-fraud and market manipulation laws enforced by agencies like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).</li><li>Investor beware: A significant aspect of the previous stance was that purchasers had limited protection under federal securities laws.</li></ul><h2 id="sec-rules-how-to-build-a-%E2%80%9Clegal%E2%80%9D-memecoin">SEC Rules: How to Build a “Legal” Memecoin</h2>On February 27, 2025, SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a staff guidance on memecoin regulation clarifying that typical memecoins are generally not considered securities.&nbsp;This guidance regarding crypto regulation clarifies how promoters can structure these assets to potentially avoid classification under federal securities laws.&nbsp;Key aspects of the SEC rules include:<ul><li>Focus on collectible nature: Memecoins are likened to collectibles, with their value primarily driven by speculation, social sentiment, and market demand.</li><li>No common enterprise: Promoters should not pool purchaser funds to develop the coin or an associated enterprise. The coin’s success should not rely on the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others.</li><li>Limited or no utility: Legal memecoins typically have very little to no real-world use or functionality beyond entertainment and social interaction.</li><li>Discouraging profit expectations: Promoters should avoid creating a reasonable expectation of profit derived from their own efforts. Their actions should be limited to social media hyping, not business development.</li><li>Explicit risk warnings: Promoters should accompany the coin with clear <a href="https://www.delta.exchange/blog/risk-management-crypto-options-trading?category=all">disclaimers stating risks</a>, lack of utility, and that purchasers should not expect to profit.&nbsp;</li></ul>Please Note: It is important to remember that this staff statement is not a binding rule from the SEC itself, and the economic reality of each specific token will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Labeling a security as a “memecoin” to evade regulation will not work.<h2 id="what%E2%80%99s-the-political-context-of-the-memecoin-regulation">What’s the Political Context of The Memecoin Regulation?</h2>The 2025 SEC rule emerged under the Trump administration’s pro-crypto stance, contrasting the prior “regulation-by-enforcement” approach. This shift aimed to provide clarity and reduce regulatory ambiguity for the crypto industry, moving away from previous perceived hostility.&nbsp;The guidance is controversial.&nbsp;Critics argue it creates regulatory gaps, leaving investors exposed to fraud and market manipulation. It also raised questions regarding potential conflicts of interest, as some political figures benefited financially from related memecoin ventures like the $TRUMP token.<h2 id="the-bottomline">The Bottomline</h2>This memecoin regulation proposal reads less like a narrow memecoin rule and more like a test bed for how far automated, data‑driven financial regulation can go in <a href="https://www.delta.exchange/" rel="noreferrer">crypto trading</a>.&nbsp;If adopted in something close to its current form, it would turn “legal” memecoins into structured products with audits, disclosures, registries, and on‑chain controls - closer to small‑cap altcoins with meme branding than to the wild, viral tokens that built this corner of crypto culture.​For builders, the message is quite clear: a future “legal” memecoin may need real utility, hard‑coded protections against rug pulls, and traceable accountability baked into governance from day one.&nbsp;For traders and communities, the trade‑off is sharper: more safety and clarity on compliant tokens, but a much narrower playground for chaotic, high‑risk meme experiments that sit outside that green zone and could be fenced off from regulated platforms.

Here is everything you need to know about the revised memecoin regulation proposal. Stay updated on SEC rules and crypto regulations.

Memecoin Regulation Proposal: What Do We Know So Far